Everything about René Collier

A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between possible neighbours over the construction of a wall in a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a case which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of planning breaches, environmental considerations, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier as well as the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal battle.

Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to make their relatives household. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of recognized citizens. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below planning authorization.

René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their planning authorization by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Special Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as such areas are matter to rigid controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Inside their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological consequences, specially inside a sensitive coastal ecosystem for example Sutton Strand.

Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach of their setting up permission, and say the wall, and that is partly built, is in the correct place. Their lawful group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to preserve their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of The ocean are each hugely prized and hotly contested.

The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts through the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the site, according to sworn proof referenced in the Irish Times. In one account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-superior drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions, an image which has given that turn into emblematic from the intensity on the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they were meant to gather Visible proof on the wall’s position relative to tidal strains and protected land.

Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Occasions noted, describing how The 2 men entered the drinking water during significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm h2o to photograph the positioning grew to become Just about the most placing descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Moments report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of actions ended up cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was staying encroached on.

The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included in detail with the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned extensively searched phrases as viewers sought to grasp the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard even more submissions on no matter whether interim orders should be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment inside the authorized timeline.

For the core in the dispute can be a disagreement around boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as created, goes beyond what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been described as meticulous in his evaluation of scheduling documents, maps, and disorders hooked up to the permission.

Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is enthusiastic by concern for environmental security and adherence to organizing legislation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving a private look at, insisting as a substitute that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the realm and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.

On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a pair simply just attempting to make a household property in accordance Along with the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Spot of Conservation and say that every one will work have already been performed based upon Qualified advice and authorised strategies. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with moving into the sea all through a storm, usually do not alter the fundamental points.

The situation has also raised broader questions on how scheduling disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above design of wall at coastal site is now a shorthand description to get a circumstance that lots of observers see as ever more popular. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, community foreshore, and guarded habitats is becoming far more contentious.

The Irish Instances article about René Collier mentioned that the businessman experienced previously been linked to local advocacy on planning and environmental issues, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from pretty diverse Expert backgrounds can find themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, have grown to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.

Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site in the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-substantial water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by midsection-high water in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting equally the Bodily fact with the coastline and also the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these steps shown dedication; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal solution.

Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the end result stays unsure. The courtroom should establish whether or not the wall as developed complies with organizing permission and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and preparing disorders. Yet the human ingredient continues to be central: neighbours who have to Dwell along with each other extensive after the legal expenditures happen to be paid.

Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past Irish Times article about René Collier that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic troubles including environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.

In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be an area of pure magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. Whether it is going to finally be altered, eliminated, or finished as planned will depend on the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will probable continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.